Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device.
Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
We have seen both good and not so good AI assisted PRs
We want to make sure we are encouraging meaningful contributions, not creating barriers to good work
Doug - pretty sure we’re at the point where AI is used on pretty much every piece of code. Requiring disclosure might be too much of a burden.
Remi - thinks disclosure is likely a good idea, just from a reviewer perspective.
Cuneyt - have we talked about using AI code review tools as well?
Carol: not as a TAC or foundation, but we could certainly try it as a project if we should so desire.
TSC feels that the rule around good first issues from LLVM in particular is too strict. We don’t want to discourage new contributors from learning however suits them best.
OCIO in general is a relatively low-volume contribution project, so would prefer to not put more process in place that isn’t strictly needed.
Main convo is how to relate OCIO RGB space to CICP / video spaces (YUV, etc). How to do this handoff and convey it
Zach thinks that the handoff should assume OCIO is RGB full range data. Would be useful to map OCIO display colorspaces to a full CICP tuple in general.
Please review and comment, and we will post more publicly.